Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the userpro domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/u768393806/domains/investmentbell.com/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the userpro-rating domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/u768393806/domains/investmentbell.com/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the permalink-manager domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/u768393806/domains/investmentbell.com/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the rocket domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/u768393806/domains/investmentbell.com/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121

Notice: La función _load_textdomain_just_in_time ha sido llamada de forma incorrecta. La carga de la traducción para el dominio td-cloud-library se activó demasiado pronto. Esto suele ser un indicador de que algún código del plugin o tema se ejecuta demasiado pronto. Las traducciones deberían cargarse en la acción init o más tarde. Por favor, ve depuración en WordPress para más información. (Este mensaje fue añadido en la versión 6.7.0). in /home/u768393806/domains/investmentbell.com/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
US Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Coinbase In Arbitration Dispute | InvestmentBell

NoticiasCepoCorte Suprema de EE. UU. falla a favor de Coinbase en disputa de arbitraje

Corte Suprema de EE. UU. falla a favor de Coinbase en disputa de arbitraje

(Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday backed cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN) Global Inc’s bid to halt customer lawsuits while it pursues appeals aimed at moving the disputes out of courts and into private arbitration, which businesses often prefer over litigation.

The justices overturned a lower court’s ruling involving a user who sued after a scammer stole money from his account. The lower court had let a proposed class action lawsuit proceed while Coinbase pressed its appeal contending that the claims belong in arbitration.

Companies generally prefer to arbitrate claims because the process is cheaper and faster than litigation in court, which can be harder to fight and carries a greater risk of hefty damages awards.

Coinbase’s exchange allows users to transact in digital currencies such as bitcoin and ether. The company asserts that its user agreement requires disputes to be resolved through arbitration and that under a law called the Federal Arbitration Act, which governs dispute resolution proceedings through arbitration, action in trial courts must come to a halt when a denial of a request to compel arbitration is appealed.

One of the cases involves a California lawsuit by customer Abraham Bielski, who alleged that a scammer stole more than $30,000 from his Coinbase account in 2021. The suit accused the company of violating the Electronic Funds Transfer Act by not investigating or recrediting Bielski’s account.

In the other suit, former users accused the company of violating California’s false advertising law by duping them into paying to participate in a 2021 sweepstakes that offered prizes in dogecoin, a type of cryptocurrency.

In both cases, federal judges refused to force the claims into arbitration, as the company argued the user agreements required. While Coinbase immediately appealed those decisions, the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 2022 refused the company’s requests to put further litigation on hold pending those appeals.

Corte Suprema de EE. UU. falla a favor de Coinbase en disputa de arbitraje

0
ARTÍCULOS RELACIONADOS
video
jugar-redondear-llenar

Más popular